1. Introduction: Altered States as Windows into Consciousness

1.1 Setting the Stage

The quest to understand human consciousness often involves examining states that deviate from ordinary waking awareness. Among the most intriguing of these are lucid dreaming (LD) and the states induced by psychedelic substances, often termed psychedelic consciousness (PC). Both represent distinct altered states of consciousness (ASCs) , offering unique perspectives on the fundamental nature of subjective experience, self-awareness, perception, and the construction of reality. These states are not mere curiosities; they possess deep historical roots in spiritual practices, philosophical inquiry, and therapeutic exploration. The modern resurgence of scientific interest in both LD and psychedelics underscores their potential to illuminate the workings of the mind and brain. This report undertakes an expert-level comparative analysis of LD and PC, delving into their defining characteristics, phenomenological landscapes, neurobiological underpinnings, and relevant theoretical interpretations. The aim is to provide a comprehensive synthesis that highlights both the common ground and the critical distinctions between these fascinating refractions of conscious experience.

1.2 The Comparative Approach

To achieve a nuanced comparison, this report will systematically examine LD and PC. It begins by defining each state, outlining its core features and typical subjective manifestations. Subsequently, the phenomenology – the first-person experience – of both states will be compared across key dimensions such as perception, emotion, cognition, and sense of self. Following this, the known and hypothesized neurobiological correlates, including brain network activity, neurotransmitter systems, and electrophysiological signatures, will be contrasted. The report will then evaluate how various theoretical frameworks interpret these states. This includes considering the neuropsychoanalytic perspective associated with Dr. Raz Even, as suggested by content on dreamtheory.org, alongside other prominent theories from cognitive neuroscience and philosophy, such as predictive processing models. The specific comparison of PC to lucid dreaming, rather than just dreaming in general, is particularly pertinent, as multiple analyses suggest a closer phenomenological relationship between PC and the heightened awareness characteristic of lucidity. Finally, the findings will be synthesized to draw conclusions about the nature of consciousness itself. This comparative methodology is valuable not only for delineating the unique profiles of LD and PC but also for identifying potentially shared mechanisms and fundamental principles governing conscious states.

Examining these states comparatively allows them to function as unique ‘natural experiments’. Both LD, an endogenously generated state arising from sleep, and PC, typically induced by exogenous pharmacological agents, involve significant departures from the baseline functioning of waking consciousness. These departures impact core components of subjective experience, including perception, self-representation, emotional processing, and cognitive function. By studying how consciousness is altered – how components are enhanced, diminished, or rearranged – researchers can make inferences about the mechanisms underlying normal conscious experience. The contrast between the internally generated alterations in LD and the externally triggered changes in PC provides a powerful framework for isolating different factors that shape our conscious world.

Furthermore, this comparison challenges overly simplistic, linear views of consciousness often conceptualized as varying along a single ‘level’. While terms like ‘higher states’ are sometimes applied, particularly to psychedelic experiences , a detailed analysis reveals a more complex picture. Both LD and PC exhibit enhancements in certain domains (e.g., vivid imagery, emotional intensity, associative thought) alongside potential impairments or alterations in others (e.g., executive control, reality testing, logical coherence). Lucid dreaming, for instance, involves heightened self-awareness and potential volitional control emerging within sleep, a state traditionally considered ‘lower’ than waking. Psychedelic states might offer profound insights or mystical feelings but often at the cost of diminished contact with consensual reality. Comparing the distinct profiles of LD and PC across multiple phenomenological and cognitive dimensions thus supports a multidimensional conception of consciousness, where different states occupy unique positions within a complex state-space rather than simply ranking higher or lower on a single scale.

2. Lucid Dreaming: Consciousness within Sleep

2.1 Definition and Core Characteristics

Lucid dreaming (LD) is formally defined as a state of consciousness occurring during sleep in which the dreamer becomes aware that they are dreaming. This metacognitive insight – the realization “I am dreaming” – is the quintessential feature distinguishing LD from typical, non-lucid dream states. While often accompanied by enhanced dream vividness or the potential for volitional control over the dream environment, these are secondary characteristics; the core criterion remains the awareness of the dream state itself. LD should be differentiated from related phenomena such as pre-lucid dreams (where the dreamer questions reality but doesn’t achieve full certainty) or simply vivid dreams lacking the crucial element of awareness.

Lucid dreaming is not merely a passive experience but can be a trainable cognitive skill. Various techniques, including reality testing during wakefulness, mnemonic induction methods (MILD), and wake-back-to-bed (WBTB) protocols, have been developed to increase the frequency of lucid dreams. Physiologically, LD is most commonly associated with the rapid eye movement (REM) phase of sleep , particularly during the later REM periods occurring towards the morning. However, reports of lucidity emerging from non-REM (NREM) sleep stages, particularly N1 and N2, also exist, suggesting that the neurophysiological substrate for lucidity might not be exclusively tied to REM sleep mechanisms.

Historically, the phenomenon of knowing one is dreaming has been recognized for centuries, with references found in the writings of Aristotle and Sir Thomas Browne. However, its scientific investigation was hampered by the subjective nature of the experience. A breakthrough occurred in the late 1970s and early 1980s with the development of objective verification methods. Researchers demonstrated that lucid dreamers could make pre-arranged volitional eye movements (e.g., left-right-left-right sequences) while physiologically confirmed to be in REM sleep, signaling their conscious awareness to observers in the laboratory. This “signal-verified” lucidity provided empirical validation for the existence of consciousness during sleep and paved the way for neurobiological investigations.

2.2 Phenomenology: The Subjective Experience of Lucidity

The subjective tapestry of lucid dreaming is rich and multifaceted, centered around the core experience of awareness.

• Awareness & Insight: The defining feature is the conscious recognition of the dream state while it is ongoing. This insight entails an orientation to one’s current state as distinct from waking reality. It often includes awareness of the dream environment as a construct, awareness of oneself as the dreaming subject, awareness of the capacity to make decisions within the dream, and access to memory functions related to both the dream and the waking world. This conscious knowledge or insight is considered the most robust difference between lucid and non-lucid dreaming.
• Volitional Control: While not a necessary condition for lucidity, the awareness of dreaming often brings the potential for volitional control. Lucid dreamers may find they can influence the dream narrative, direct their own actions within the dream, or even alter the dream environment. The degree of control varies significantly, and experienced or “proficient” lucid dreamers may develop considerable skill in navigating and manipulating their dream worlds for specific purposes, such as exploration, skill rehearsal, or problem-solving.
• Perceptual Qualities: Lucid dreams are frequently described as exceptionally vivid and perceptually intense. The dream world can appear remarkably clear and detailed, sometimes exceeding the perceived clarity of non-lucid dreams. Peculiar kinesthetic sensations, such as flying, floating, or levitating, are commonly reported. While visual imagery dominates, other sensory modalities, including auditory, tactile, olfactory, and gustatory sensations, can also be present, and may be particularly heightened in individuals with congenital blindness. There can be a contrast between the sometimes imprecise or mutable nature of the dreamer’s own body representation within the dream and the potential for highly detailed and stable dream landscapes.
• Cognitive Features: Lucidity is associated with the return of cognitive functions typically suppressed during non-lucid REM sleep. This includes access to waking life memories , the capacity for more logical or linear thought (though dream logic may still differ from waking logic) , and crucially, self-reflective awareness or metacognition – the ability to think about one’s own mental state. This cognitive enhancement underlies the potential for using lucid dreams for creative problem-solving or skill refinement. This contrasts sharply with the typical ‘hypofrontality’ of non-lucid REM sleep, where reduced activity in frontal brain regions is thought to impair logical reasoning and self-awareness.
• Emotional Tone: While non-lucid dreams can often have a negative emotional bias , lucid dreams are frequently associated with positive emotions such as joy, exhilaration, or curiosity. However, negative emotions can also occur within a lucid dream. The ability to recognize the dream state and potentially exert control can be harnessed therapeutically, for instance, to confront and overcome recurrent nightmares.
• Sense of Self & Reality: A key aspect of lucidity is the awareness of the self as distinct from the dream environment and the understanding that the dream is not waking reality. This includes recognizing that the apparent physical laws of the dream world may not be binding and that actions taken within the dream will not have consequences in the waking world. The experience can sometimes involve feelings of dissociation or even out-of-body experiences (OBEs), although the precise relationship and distinction between LD and OBEs remain debated. Some philosophical models, like the ‘Dyadic Model’, propose that lucid dreaming involves the simultaneous presence (tokening) of both dreaming mental states (e.g., imaginative simulations) and non-dreaming states (e.g., the conscious knowledge of dreaming).

The phenomenon of lucid dreaming strongly suggests a remarkable re-emergence of higher-order cognitive functions within the sleep state. Typical REM sleep is characterized by reduced activity in brain circuits associated with self-reflection, insight, and executive control, particularly in frontal and parietal areas. Lucid dreaming, defined by the very return of this insight and awareness , appears to involve a reactivation of these specific cognitive systems. Neurobiological studies support this, showing increased activity in these same frontal and parietal regions during lucid episodes compared to non-lucid REM. This indicates that lucidity is not merely a change in dream content but represents a fundamental shift in the state of consciousness during sleep, reflecting a dynamic interplay where waking-like cognitive capacities, particularly metacognition and self-awareness, become accessible within the ongoing dream.

3. Psychedelic Consciousness: Chemically Altered Realities

3.1 Definition and Core Characteristics

Psychedelic consciousness refers to the distinct altered state of consciousness (ASC) induced by the administration of a specific class of pharmacological compounds known as psychedelics or hallucinogens. The term “psychedelic,” coined by Humphry Osmond, derives from Greek roots meaning “mind-manifesting” , reflecting the capacity of these substances to bring forth aspects of the mind not typically accessible in ordinary waking consciousness. Classic, or serotonergic, psychedelics include substances like lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), psilocybin (the active compound in ‘magic mushrooms’), N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), and mescaline (found in peyote cactus). Their effects are profoundly influenced by the dosage administered, as well as non-pharmacological factors known as “set” (the individual’s mindset, expectations, and psychological state) and “setting” (the physical and social environment in which the experience takes place).

These substances have a long history of use in various cultures for religious, spiritual, and shamanic purposes. Following a period of intense scientific research in the mid-20th century and subsequent restriction, there has been a significant resurgence of interest in their potential therapeutic applications in recent decades. Modern research investigates their use, often in conjunction with psychotherapy, for conditions such as depression, anxiety, PTSD, and addiction.

3.2 Phenomenology: The Subjective Experience of Psychedelics

The subjective effects of psychedelic substances are diverse and complex, encompassing profound alterations in perception, cognition, emotion, and the sense of self.

• Perceptual Alterations: Changes in sensory perception are a hallmark of the psychedelic state. Visual alterations are particularly common and can range from simple geometric patterns (often referred to as Klüver’s form constants), fractal imagery, and intensified, vivid colors, to complex visual hallucinations, distortions of objects and environments, and the apparent animation of static images. Synesthesia, the blending of sensory modalities (e.g., “seeing” sounds), may also occur. Auditory and tactile perceptions can also be significantly altered. These perceptual changes are not merely passive reception; they can be influenced by the individual’s expectations and internal state, sometimes interpreted as prior beliefs or expectations imposing themselves onto sensory input.
• Cognitive Shifts: Psychedelic consciousness involves marked shifts in thought patterns. Thinking may become less linear and logical, and more associative, metaphorical, and fluid. This can lead to novel perspectives, a sense of profound insight, and enhanced meaning-making, potentially contributing to therapeutic benefits. However, cognition can also become disrupted, and in some cases, delusional thinking or temporary confusion may arise. The cognitive style often resembles what psychoanalysis terms “primary process thinking,” characterized by its non-rational, associative nature.
• Emotional Experiences: Emotion is typically intensified and amplified during psychedelic experiences. The emotional range can be broad, encompassing states of profound euphoria, ecstasy, oceanic bliss, universal love, and deep feelings of connection. Conversely, challenging emotions such as anxiety, fear, paranoia, or dysphoria can also arise, often influenced by set and setting. Neurobiological studies suggest psychedelics modulate key emotion-processing circuits in the brain, potentially dampening the response of areas like the amygdala to fearful stimuli.
• Sense of Self (Ego Dissolution): Perhaps the most distinctive psychological effect of higher doses of classic psychedelics is the phenomenon of “ego dissolution” or “ego disintegration”. This refers to a weakening or complete dissolution of the ordinary sense of self as a separate, bounded entity. Individuals may report a blurring of the boundaries between themselves and the external world, a feeling of merging with their surroundings, or a sense of unity with nature, the cosmos, or all existence. This experience can be understood in relation to historical philosophical and psychological distinctions regarding different aspects of ego-consciousness.
• Altered Sense of Reality/Meaning: The psychedelic state often involves profound alterations in the perception of reality itself. Time and space may seem distorted, compressed, or expanded. Users frequently report a heightened sense of connection – to others, to nature, or to the universe. Experiences often take on a mystical or transcendent quality, characterized by feelings of awe, sacredness, and ineffability. A prominent feature is the “noetic quality” – a strong subjective sense that the experience has revealed profound truths or ultimate reality.

The wide array of psychedelic effects, encompassing perception, belief, and selfhood, finds a compelling explanatory framework in predictive processing (PP) theories of brain function. PP models propose that the brain constantly generates predictions about incoming sensory information based on hierarchical internal models, aiming to minimize prediction errors. Psychedelic phenomena can be understood as resulting from alterations to this predictive machinery. Theories like REBUS (Relaxed Beliefs Under Psychedelics) and the broader ALBUS (Altered Beliefs Under Psychedelics) framework suggest that these substances modulate the precision or weighting of the brain’s predictions (priors) at various levels of the hierarchy. For instance, visual hallucinations might arise when high-level priors strongly override bottom-up sensory data. Ego dissolution could represent the weakening or collapse of the highest-level prior corresponding to the self-model. The therapeutic potential for insight might stem from the relaxation of rigid, maladaptive priors (e.g., negative self-beliefs in depression), allowing for their revision. This PP perspective offers a unifying mechanism that can potentially account for the diverse subjective effects of psychedelics on perception, cognition, and the sense of self by positing fundamental changes in how the brain models and predicts its world.

4. Phenomenological Landscapes: Comparing Subjective Experiences

Comparing the first-person accounts of lucid dreaming and psychedelic consciousness reveals a fascinating landscape of overlapping features and stark divergences. While both states offer departures from ordinary waking reality, the nature of these departures differs significantly, particularly concerning self-awareness and interaction with the experienced world.

4.1 Perception and Imagery

A primary similarity lies in the generation of vivid, immersive internal worlds, predominantly visual in nature, which are often experienced as convincingly real during the state itself. Both LD and PC seem to involve a combination of bottom-up sensory-like processing and top-down generation of mental imagery. Psychedelics can intensify voluntary mental imagery to the point where it rivals perceived reality, and similarly, dreams (especially lucid ones) are characterized by their hallucinatory, sensorimotor richness.

However, differences emerge in the specific content and the relationship to external input. Psychedelic visual experiences frequently include elementary geometric forms, fractals, and abstract movements (Klüver’s form constants), phenomena that are reportedly rare in typical non-lucid dreams but may occasionally manifest in lucid dreams. A crucial distinction is the degree of coupling to the external environment. Psychedelic perception, particularly with eyes open, remains influenced by ongoing sensory input from the body and the world, whereas non-lucid dreaming typically involves a functional disconnection, generating an intrinsically simulated reality. Lucid dreaming shares the potential for perceptual clarity found in psychedelic states but remains an internally generated simulation. Some comparisons also suggest that the visual imagery component might be more pronounced in psychedelic experiences compared to other profound altered states like near-death experiences (NDEs).

4.2 Emotional Tone and Content

Both LD and PC can involve significant activation of emotions and access to emotional memories. Both states can involve confronting fear-laden material, and this imaginary exposure is hypothesized to play a role in fear memory extinction and emotional regulation processes, contributing to the therapeutic potential discussed for both phenomena.

The typical emotional valence, however, can differ. Non-lucid dreaming is sometimes suggested to have a bias towards negative emotions like anxiety and fear. In contrast, psychedelic experiences frequently encompass intensely positive affective states, including profound joy, universal love, oceanic bliss, and feelings of unity, often contributing to their characterization as mystical or transcendent. While lucid dreams are often associated with positive affect like excitement or curiosity , the peak experiences described in psychedelic reports seem qualitatively different and less commonly attributed to typical dreaming, although potentially accessible within certain lucid or profound dream experiences.

4.3 Sense of Self and Ego

Alterations to the ordinary waking sense of self are common to both states. Experiences such as depersonalization (feeling detached from oneself), dissociation, and changes in perceived body boundaries can occur in both LD and PC.

The most striking difference, however, lies in the direction of change relative to the baseline ego. Psychedelic consciousness, particularly at higher doses, is famously characterized by ego dissolution – a profound weakening or loss of the sense of being a separate, bounded self, often accompanied by feelings of merging or unity with the environment. Lucid dreaming, conversely, is defined by an increase in self-awareness and metacognitive insight – the dreamer becomes more aware of their own mental state and identity as the dreamer, distinct from the dream itself. While dissociation can be a feature of LD , it typically manifests as the waking self observing or recognizing the dream state , rather than the dissolution of the self-structure that defines the psychedelic peak experience. LD involves identifying with the waking self within the dream; PC involves the potential breakdown of that self.

4.4 Cognition and Thought Style

Both LD and PC can exhibit cognitive styles that deviate from the linear, logical “secondary process” thinking of typical wakefulness, leaning towards more associative, non-linear, and sometimes bizarre “primary process” patterns. This shared feature might underlie the reported potential for both states to facilitate creative insight and problem-solving.

Yet, significant cognitive differences exist. Lucid dreaming is marked by the re-emergence of metacognitive abilities, a degree of logical reasoning, and access to waking memories – functions typically diminished in non-lucid REM sleep. In psychedelic states, while insight may occur, executive functions, logical reasoning, and memory access can be variably impaired, enhanced, or simply altered in unconventional ways, often differing significantly from the structured self-reflection possible in LD.

4.5 Reality Testing and Volition

Reality testing – the ability to distinguish internal experience from external reality – follows contrasting trajectories. Non-lucid dreams are characterized by a failure of reality testing (the dreamer believes the dream is real), and this capacity can also be significantly compromised or altered during psychedelic experiences. Lucid dreaming, by its very definition, represents successful reality testing within the dream state.

Similarly, volition differs. A key potential feature of LD is the ability to exert volitional control over one’s actions or even the dream environment, allowing for purposeful interaction with the simulated world. Psychedelic states, while preserving basic motor control (unlike the atonia of REM sleep), are often subjectively characterized by a feeling of loss of control, a sense of being carried along by the experience rather than directing it.

The comparison between LD and PC highlights perhaps their most fundamental phenomenological divergence in the realm of self-experience. Lucid dreaming represents the emergence of self-awareness, metacognitive insight, and the observing ego within a state (REM sleep) that normally suppresses these functions. Psychedelic consciousness, conversely, often involves the dissolution or disintegration of the established waking ego structure. This suggests they might occupy opposite poles relative to the baseline state of self-consciousness. LD involves recognizing the dream as a dream through enhanced reality testing , while PC often involves a profound alteration of perceived reality, sometimes accepted as veridical within the state. This points to fundamentally different ways of modulating the self-model and its relationship to perceived reality: LD appears to strengthen the capacity for self-reflection and differentiation from the experienced world, whereas PC can weaken the very boundaries of the self-model itself.

Table 1: Comparative Phenomenology of Lucid Dreaming and Psychedelic Consciousness

Feature	Non-Lucid Dream (REM Baseline)	Lucid Dream	Psychedelic State
Perception	Vivid, immersive, intrinsic simulation	Vivid, clear, internally generated	Vivid, enhanced intensity, influenced by external stimuli
Imagery	Primarily visual, can be bizarre	Primarily visual, high clarity possible	Often visual (incl. geometrics), synesthesia possible
Emotion	Activated, potential negative bias	Activated, often positive affect	Intensified, broad range (positive/negative), mystical
Self/Ego	“Single-minded,” self part of dream narrative	Increased self-awareness, distinct from dream	Ego dissolution/loss of boundaries possible
Cognition	Illogical, associative, primary process	Metacognition, logic, memory access return	Associative, insight potential, logic variable
Reality Testing	Absent (dream taken as real)	Present (knowledge of dreaming)	Diminished or altered
Volition	Lack of control	Potential for control over actions/dream	Reduced cognitive control, loss of self-control

5. Neurobiological Underpinnings: Brain States in Flux

Comparing the neurobiology of lucid dreaming and psychedelic consciousness reveals both intriguing parallels and fundamental differences in brain activity patterns, network dynamics, and neurochemical modulation.

5.1 Brain Regions and Networks

• Lucid Dreaming: Neuroimaging studies, though often limited by small sample sizes or case study designs, consistently point towards increased activation and connectivity in specific cortical networks during LD compared to non-lucid REM sleep. Key regions implicated include the prefrontal cortex (PFC), particularly the anterior PFC (aPFC) and dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC, corresponding roughly to Brodmann areas 9 and 10), the parietal cortex (including the precuneus and inferior parietal lobules – angular and supramarginal gyri), and temporoparietal junction areas. These regions are strongly associated with higher-order cognitive functions such as metacognition, self-awareness, working memory, reality testing, and the sense of agency – precisely the functions that define the lucid state subjectively. Studies also report increased functional connectivity between these frontal and temporoparietal areas during lucidity or in frequent lucid dreamers. This pattern is often interpreted as a reactivation of cortical areas and networks that are typically hypoactive during non-lucid REM sleep.
• Psychedelic Consciousness: Psychedelic states are characterized by significant modulation of large-scale brain networks, differing notably from the pattern seen in LD. A central finding is the disruption of the Default Mode Network (DMN), a network typically active during rest and implicated in self-referential thought, mind-wandering, and integrating information about oneself. Studies consistently show decreased functional connectivity within the DMN, particularly between key hubs like the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), as well as overall decreased DMN integrity under psychedelics like psilocybin, LSD, and ayahuasca. This DMN disruption is strongly correlated with the subjective intensity of ego dissolution. Concurrently, psychedelics often lead to increased functional connectivity between normally segregated brain networks, suggesting a state of heightened global integration or less constrained communication across the brain. Alterations within cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) feedback loops have also been proposed, potentially leading to deficits in thalamic sensory gating and contributing to the characteristic sensory flooding and cognitive alterations. Furthermore, changes in Medial Temporal Lobe (MTL) activity, including increased signal variance in structures like the hippocampus and amygdala, and a decoupling of the MTLs from the disrupted DMN, are observed. Interestingly, while REM sleep typically involves heightened amygdala activity , some psychedelic studies report a dampening of amygdala response to emotional stimuli.

5.2 Neurotransmitter Systems

• Lucid Dreaming: LD occurs predominantly during REM sleep, a state known to be characterized by high levels of acetylcholine and low levels of monoamines (serotonin, norepinephrine). However, the specific neurochemical changes that trigger the shift from non-lucid to lucid REM sleep are not well established from the provided sources. Lucidity appears to emerge from endogenous shifts in brain state dynamics within the broader cholinergic REM context, rather than being linked to a specific, acute neurotransmitter surge analogous to drug action.
• Psychedelic Consciousness: The neurochemistry of classic psychedelic effects is much more clearly defined. The primary mechanism of action is agonism at serotonin 5-HT2A receptors. The potency of a psychedelic substance strongly correlates with its binding affinity for this receptor subtype. Pharmacological blockade of 5-HT2A receptors with antagonists like ketanserin significantly attenuates the subjective and neural effects of psychedelics, confirming the receptor’s crucial role. While 5-HT2A agonism is primary, downstream modulatory effects on other neurotransmitter systems, including dopamine and glutamate, are also implicated in the overall profile of psychedelic action.

5.3 EEG Signatures

• Lucid Dreaming: Electroencephalography (EEG) studies of LD have yielded somewhat inconsistent findings, partly due to methodological challenges like small sample sizes and potential artifacts (e.g., eye movements contaminating the signal). However, recurring findings suggest a pattern distinct from non-lucid REM. Reports include increased power in the gamma frequency band (~40 Hz), particularly in frontal or frontolateral regions , although the contribution of muscular artifacts (saccadic spike potentials) to this finding is debated and requires careful control. Increased power in the beta range (~13-19 Hz) over parietal areas has also been observed. Conversely, a decrease in delta band power (slow waves, ~1-4 Hz) in frontal and central regions is another replicated finding, potentially indicating increased cortical activation or reduced sleep depth during lucidity. Increased EEG coherence, particularly in frontolateral areas, suggesting more synchronized activity similar to waking, has also been reported. Findings regarding alpha power (8-12 Hz) have been inconsistent and lack strong replication. Overall, the EEG profile of LD is often described as a hybrid state, incorporating features of both REM sleep (e.g., background theta activity) and wakefulness (e.g., increased higher frequency power and coherence).
• Psychedelic Consciousness: EEG studies of psychedelic states often report a decrease in alpha power, particularly in posterior regions, which correlates with the intensity of subjective effects, including ego dissolution. An increase in the complexity or entropy of the EEG signal is another key finding, reflecting more unpredictable and less constrained brain dynamics. Some studies, particularly with DMT, have reported increases in lower frequency delta and theta band activity, similar to patterns seen in dreaming. Changes in EEG coherence across different frequency bands and regions are also part of the psychedelic signature.

5.4 Brain Entropy and Criticality

• Psychedelic Consciousness: A prominent theoretical framework suggests that psychedelic states represent a shift towards higher brain entropy. Entropy, in this context, signifies increased randomness, unpredictability, and a wider repertoire of accessible brain states or functional connectivity patterns. This state of elevated entropy is proposed to move the brain closer to “criticality” – a theoretical point poised between order and chaos, thought to be optimal for information processing and adaptation. The disruption of stable networks like the DMN and the increase in global connectivity are seen as manifestations of this entropic increase.
• Lucid Dreaming: While LD involves a complex state change, it is less commonly framed purely in terms of increased global entropy in the same way as PC. The reactivation of specific, organized frontoparietal networks associated with waking cognition might suggest a move towards more structured, rather than less structured, activity in those particular regions, albeit within the context of REM sleep. Notably, one study highlighted that functional connectivity in the alpha band increased during LD, contrasting with the reductions often seen in psychedelic states, potentially reflecting enhanced self-awareness rather than global network dissolution. The precise relationship between LD and concepts like entropy and criticality requires further investigation.

The distinct neurobiological profiles strongly suggest divergent mechanisms underlying the altered self-experiences characteristic of LD and PC. Lucid dreaming appears to involve the recruitment and reactivation of frontoparietal networks – neural systems associated with executive function, metacognition, and agency – onto the background state of REM sleep. This aligns with the subjective experience of gaining self-awareness and reflective capacity. Psychedelic consciousness, conversely, is strongly associated with the disruption and disintegration of the Default Mode Network, the very network thought to underpin the ordinary waking sense of self or ego. This aligns with the subjective experience of ego dissolution. Therefore, while both states profoundly alter self-consciousness, they seem to achieve this via contrasting neural strategies: LD enhances reflective capacity by activating specific higher-order networks, while PC dismantles the brain’s default mode of self-representation.

Furthermore, the neurochemical basis highlights a key etiological difference. The profound effects of classic psychedelics are critically dependent on their interaction with the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. This specific pharmacological trigger contrasts sharply with lucid dreaming, which emerges endogenously from the complex interplay of brain rhythms and network dynamics during REM sleep, without a known, specific molecular trigger for the onset of lucidity itself (beyond the general cholinergic milieu of REM). This fundamental difference in origin underscores that even where phenomenological similarities exist, the causal pathways leading to LD and PC are distinct, involving specific drug-receptor interactions in one case and intrinsic state fluctuations in the other.

Table 2: Comparative Neurobiology of Lucid Dreaming and Psychedelic Consciousness

Feature	Non-Lucid REM (Baseline)	Lucid Dream	Psychedelic State (e.g., Psilocybin, LSD)
Key Regions/Networks
PFC/Parietal	Hypoactive (esp. DLPFC, parietal)	Increased activity/connectivity (aPFC, dlPFC, parietal)	Variable; DMN nodes (mPFC, PCC) activity decreased
DMN	Variable activity, distinct from waking	Less studied; potential modulation via PFC/Parietal links	Decreased within-network connectivity, integrity
MTL (Hippocampus/Amygdala)	Active (esp. Amygdala)	Less clear; potentially modulated by frontoparietal network	Increased BOLD variance, decoupled from DMN ; Amygdala response may decrease
CSTC Loops	Normal REM state dynamics	Not specifically implicated	Altered connectivity, potential gating deficit
Network Dynamics
Connectivity	Specific REM patterns	Increased fronto-parietal connectivity ; Increased alpha coherence	Decreased DMN connectivity; Increased global connectivity
Entropy/Complexity	Lower than waking	Less studied; potentially increased local complexity?	Increased brain entropy/signal complexity
Neurochemistry	High Acetylcholine, Low Monoamines	Occurs within REM state; no specific lucidity trigger identified	Primary: 5-HT2A Receptor Agonism
EEG Signatures	Theta background, PGO waves	Increased Gamma (~40Hz)? , Increased Parietal Beta , Decreased Delta , Increased Coherence	Decreased Alpha Power , Increased Complexity , Increased Delta/Theta (DMT)?

6. Interpreting Altered States: Dr. Raz Even’s Neuropsychoanalytic Lens

6.1 Identifying Dr. Even’s Perspective

The user query specifically requested the incorporation of Dr. Raz Even’s “web dream theory” from dreamtheory.com. However, initial investigation reveals that dreamtheory.com appears to be the website for a marketing and web design agency, not a platform for academic dream theory. A related site, dreamtheory.org, presents itself as a resource on “Dream Theories and Science of Dreaming,” edited by Dr. Raz Even. While this site covers a range of topics related to dreams and consciousness, it does not appear to articulate a specific, formally named theory such as the “web dream theory.”

Based on the content curated and presented on dreamtheory.org, Dr. Even’s perspective seems rooted in neuropsychoanalysis. This approach seeks to integrate concepts from Freudian psychoanalytic theory (such as the significance of latent dream content, wish fulfillment, unconscious drives, and the distinction between primary and secondary process thinking) with findings from modern neuroscience (including the neurobiology of REM sleep, the role of specific brain structures like the limbic system and prefrontal cortex, and the activity of large-scale networks like the DMN). The site demonstrates interest in various states of consciousness, including lucid dreaming, sleep paralysis, and the general nature of consciousness during sleep. Therefore, while a specific “web dream theory” is not identifiable, it is possible to extrapolate how a neuropsychoanalytic framework, as represented on dreamtheory.org, might interpret the phenomena of LD and PC.

6.2 Applying the Neuropsychoanalytic Lens to LD and PC

From a neuropsychoanalytic standpoint, both lucid dreaming and psychedelic consciousness would likely be viewed as states holding potential psychological meaning, rather than mere epiphenomena of random neural firing (a view contrasting with early interpretations of the activation-synthesis hypothesis ). This perspective emphasizes that dreams, and by extension potentially other ASCs like PC, can provide access to or expressions of unconscious mental processes, desires, and conflicts. LD and PC might be seen as different routes – one endogenous, one exogenous – to altered states where such material can surface.

The Freudian concepts of primary and secondary process thinking offer a useful lens. Non-lucid dreaming, with its characteristic illogicality, associative leaps, and disregard for waking constraints, aligns well with primary process thought. This is neurobiologically correlated with reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex during REM sleep. Psychedelic consciousness, also often characterized by associative, non-linear, and sometimes bizarre cognition , could similarly be interpreted as involving a shift towards primary process dominance. This might be linked neurobiologically to the observed disruption of the DMN and potentially altered prefrontal function under psychedelics. Lucid dreaming presents a fascinating hybrid: it occurs within the physiological context of sleep where primary process typically reigns, yet it involves the re-emergence of key secondary process functions – self-awareness, logical reflection (to a degree), and reality testing. LD could thus be seen as a state where the observing ego (associated with secondary process) intrudes upon or gains awareness within the primary process landscape of the dream.

Dr. Even’s editorial focus on consciousness suggests this framework would view LD as a significant expansion of conscious awareness into the sleep cycle, challenging the notion of sleep as uniformly unconscious. Psychedelic consciousness would be framed as a profound alteration of the quality and content of waking consciousness, potentially loosening ego defenses and allowing normally unconscious or preconscious material (emotions, memories, archetypal imagery) to enter conscious experience, akin to Freud’s view of dreams as a “royal road to the unconscious”.

Integrating the role of the Default Mode Network (DMN), mentioned on dreamtheory.org , offers further neuropsychoanalytic purchase. The DMN, heavily involved in self-referential processing, could be conceptualized as a neural correlate of the Freudian ‘ego’ or aspects of the self-system. From this perspective, the consistent finding of DMN disruption and decreased integrity during psychedelic states provides a compelling neurobiological substrate for the subjective experience of ego dissolution or the weakening of ego boundaries. This network disruption could be interpreted as diminishing the influence of the secondary process ego, thereby facilitating the emergence of primary process thinking and unconscious content. Conversely, the increased activation observed in prefrontal and parietal regions during lucid dreaming could represent the neural instantiation of the observing ego reasserting its functions of self-monitoring and reflection within the dream state.

6.3 Limitations and Nuances

It is crucial to reiterate that this application of a neuropsychoanalytic perspective is an interpretation based on the general themes present on dreamtheory.org, not on a specific, detailed theory authored by Dr. Even under the name “web dream theory.” This interpretation necessarily involves some speculation in bridging psychoanalytic concepts with neurobiological findings for LD and PC. Furthermore, a neuropsychoanalytic approach inherently emphasizes psychodynamic meaning and interpretation, which may complement but also differ from purely cognitive, information-processing, or pharmacological models of these states.

The value of a neuropsychoanalytic perspective, as seemingly championed by Dr. Even’s editorial work, lies in its attempt to bridge the often-separated domains of subjective meaning and objective brain function. By seeking correlations between psychoanalytic constructs (like primary/secondary process or the ego) and specific neural activity patterns (like PFC activation or DMN disruption), this approach strives for a more holistic understanding of altered states. It endeavors to explain not just how these states occur neurobiologically, but also what they might signify psychologically. For example, interpreting DMN disruption in PC as a correlate of weakened ego functions allowing primary process thought , or PFC/parietal activation in LD as the neural basis for the re-emergent observing ego , connects brain mechanisms directly to subjectively meaningful experiences, potentially enriching our understanding beyond purely reductionist accounts.

7. Alternative Theoretical Perspectives

Beyond the neuropsychoanalytic lens, several other theoretical frameworks from neuroscience, psychology, and philosophy offer valuable perspectives for understanding and comparing lucid dreaming and psychedelic consciousness.

7.1 Activation-Input-Modulation (AIM) Model

Developed by J. Allan Hobson and colleagues, the AIM model proposes a three-dimensional state space to map different states of consciousness, including waking, dreaming, and NREM sleep. The dimensions are: Activation level (overall brain activity, low to high), Input source (external vs. internal), and Modulation (the balance of key neurotransmitters, particularly aminergic vs. cholinergic). Non-lucid REM sleep is typically characterized by high activation, internal input, and cholinergic modulation. Waking involves high activation, external input, and aminergic modulation. Lucid dreaming, emerging from REM, might be mapped as retaining high activation and internal input but potentially shifting towards a more wake-like neuromodulatory balance or exhibiting unique activation patterns (like frontal activation) within the REM state. Psychedelic consciousness could be positioned within the AIM space as a state of high activation, predominantly internal (though influenced by external) input, and significantly altered neuromodulation (driven by serotonergic effects). While influential, the AIM model has faced criticism for its initial strong focus on REM sleep as the sole generator of dreaming and its analogies between dreaming and hypnosis, which later research has challenged.

7.2 Neuro-cognitive Theory of Dreaming

Contrasting with REM-centric models, neuro-cognitive theories view dreaming as a form of spontaneous cognition that exists on a continuum with waking mind-wandering. This perspective emphasizes the cognitive processes involved – imagery generation, memory reactivation, emotional simulation – rather than solely the physiological state (REM vs. NREM). Dreaming, in this view, reflects the operation of brain networks, particularly the Default Mode Network (DMN), during offline states when external input is reduced. Non-lucid dreaming represents this spontaneous cognitive activity without metacognitive awareness. Lucid dreaming could be understood within this framework as the co-occurrence of this dream-like cognitive stream with the reactivation of metacognitive monitoring capacities, perhaps analogous to becoming aware of one’s own mind-wandering during wakefulness. Psychedelic consciousness might be seen as an extreme perturbation of this cognitive system, potentially driven by drug-induced alterations in DMN activity and connectivity, leading to highly intensified and altered forms of internal mentation.

7.3 Imagination / Simulation Theories

Several theories propose that dreaming fundamentally involves processes of imagination or simulation. Dreams are seen as immersive, internally generated scenarios that simulate possible worlds, experiences, or social interactions. These theories contrast with views that treat dreams as primarily perceptual or belief-like states. Lucid dreaming poses a challenge, the “Lucidity Problem,” because the conscious knowledge that one is dreaming seems more like a belief or awareness state than a purely imaginative one. Proposed solutions include models like the Dyadic Model, suggesting LD involves both imaginative dream states and non-imaginative awareness states occurring simultaneously. Psychedelic consciousness could potentially be framed within simulation theories as a chemically induced alteration of the simulation process itself. The drug might alter the parameters governing the simulation’s realism, the coherence of the self-model within the simulation, or the rules governing interactions within the simulated world, leading to the characteristic perceptual distortions, ego alterations, and bizarre events.

7.4 Predictive Processing (PP) / REBUS / ALBUS

As introduced earlier, Predictive Processing offers a powerful framework. PP views the brain as a prediction machine, constantly generating models of the world and updating them based on sensory prediction errors. Dreaming has been proposed to serve crucial PP functions, such as consolidating memories, optimizing predictive models during offline states, or preventing overfitting by injecting noise or novelty into the system (as suggested by the Overfitted Brain Hypothesis, OBH). Psychedelics are hypothesized to act by altering the precision weighting of predictions (priors) within the brain’s hierarchical models. The REBUS model suggests a general relaxation of high-level priors (like the self-model), allowing more bottom-up sensory information to influence perception and potentially enabling the revision of entrenched beliefs. The ALBUS model extends this, proposing that psychedelics can either relax or strengthen priors at different levels or under different conditions, accounting for both insight/flexibility (relaxed priors) and phenomena like hallucinations or delusions (overly strong priors overriding sensory data). Lucid dreaming might fit into this framework as a state where metacognitive awareness arises regarding the predictive modeling process itself – recognizing the internal simulation as a simulation. This could involve a strengthening or stabilization of high-level metacognitive priors, contrasting with the proposed relaxation or destabilization of priors in the psychedelic state.

Despite their differences, several of these theoretical approaches appear to converge on a common theme: the importance of hierarchical processing and top-down control in shaping conscious experience, and how altered states like dreaming and PC involve modulations of this hierarchy. Predictive processing models explicitly posit hierarchical prediction and error signaling, with psychedelics altering the balance between top-down priors and bottom-up sensory evidence. Neuro-cognitive theories emphasizing the DMN focus on a high-level network involved in self-representation and integration, whose function is altered during dreaming and significantly disrupted by psychedelics. Even neuropsychoanalytic interpretations linking the secondary process ego to prefrontal cortical function, which is modulated during REM sleep and potentially by psychedelics, touch upon the role of top-down regulatory functions. This convergence suggests that understanding how the brain’s hierarchical control structures – particularly those involved in self-modeling, reality testing, and belief formation – are maintained, suppressed, or pharmacologically altered is key to understanding the neurocognitive basis of both lucid dreaming and psychedelic consciousness. The specific nature of the modulation clearly differs – LD involving a reassertion of top-down metacognitive control, PC often involving its disruption or radical alteration – but the hierarchical organization itself appears central to both phenomena.

8. Synthesis: Convergence, Divergence, and the Nature of Consciousness

8.1 Recapitulation of Key Findings

The comparative analysis of lucid dreaming and psychedelic consciousness reveals a complex interplay of shared features and critical distinctions. Both states represent significant deviations from ordinary waking consciousness, characterized by the generation of vivid, internally perceived worlds rich in imagery and emotion. Both can involve associative, non-linear cognitive processes and hold potential for insight and emotional processing.

However, the divergences are profound. Phenomenologically, the most salient difference lies in the experience of self: LD is defined by heightened self-awareness and the recognition of the dream state , whereas PC is often marked by ego dissolution and the blurring of self-world boundaries. This aligns with differences in reality testing (present in LD, altered in PC) and volitional control (potential in LD, often diminished in PC). Perceptual content also differs, with elementary geometric forms being characteristic of PC but not typical dreams. Neurobiologically, LD is associated with the reactivation of frontoparietal networks involved in metacognition superimposed on REM sleep , while PC is strongly linked to the disruption of the Default Mode Network and driven primarily by 5-HT2A receptor agonism. Despite these differences, multiple analyses suggest that PC shares more phenomenological similarity with lucid dreaming than with non-lucid dreaming, particularly regarding the clarity and intensity of the experience, even if the content and self-awareness components differ.

8.2 Integrating Theoretical Perspectives

Various theoretical frameworks offer complementary lenses for interpreting these findings. Neuropsychoanalytic perspectives emphasize the potential meaning embedded in both states, linking primary process thinking to neurobiological changes like reduced prefrontal control or DMN disruption, and viewing LD as an assertion of the observing ego. State-space models like AIM attempt to map LD and PC based on dimensions of activation, input, and modulation. Neuro-cognitive theories place dreaming on a continuum with mind-wandering, potentially viewing LD as this stream plus metacognition, and PC as a pharmacologically induced extreme alteration of internal cognition linked to DMN changes. Simulation theories grapple with explaining the awareness component of LD while potentially framing PC as an altered simulation. Predictive processing models (PP/REBUS/ALBUS) provide a unifying framework, interpreting dreaming as offline model optimization and PC as resulting from altered precision weighting of hierarchical priors. Across these diverse theories, a recurring theme emerges: the modulation of the brain’s hierarchical control systems, particularly those related to self-representation and reality modeling, appears central to both LD and PC, albeit through distinct mechanisms and with contrasting effects on subjective experience [Insight 9].

8.3 Implications for Understanding Consciousness

The comparison between LD and PC yields significant implications for our broader understanding of consciousness. Firstly, it strongly supports a multidimensional view of conscious states [Insight 2]. These states cannot be simply ranked on a linear scale of ‘level’; rather, they occupy distinct positions in a complex space defined by axes such as sensory richness, emotional intensity, cognitive style, self-awareness, reality testing, and volitional capacity. The fact that LD involves heightened self-awareness within sleep, while PC can combine profound insight with impaired reality testing, demonstrates the dissociability of these different components of consciousness.

Secondly, the distinct neurobiological correlates associated with contrasting subjective experiences – specifically, the link between frontoparietal activation and lucid self-awareness versus DMN disruption and ego dissolution – provide valuable data points for exploring the neural basis of consciousness (NCC) [Insight 6]. They illustrate how different patterns of large-scale network activity can give rise to fundamentally different subjective realities and senses of self.

Thirdly, the comparison highlights the constructive nature of conscious experience and the role of internal models or predictions. Both LD and PC involve internally generated worlds that feel real. LD offers a unique state where one can become aware of the constructed nature of this reality while still immersed within it. PC demonstrates how pharmacological manipulation of brain systems (potentially altering predictive models via 5-HT2A) can radically reshape perceived reality and the sense of self embedded within it [Insight 4]. Studying these states thus probes the mechanisms by which the brain generates its models of world and self.

The juxtaposition of lucid dreaming and psychedelic consciousness serves as a powerful probe into the nature of the self [Insight 10]. The self, often taken for granted in waking life, reveals its constructed and malleable nature in these altered states. Lucid dreaming demonstrates the remarkable capacity of the self for reflection, awareness, and agency, even when decoupled from the external sensory world and the usual constraints of waking physiology. It shows the observing self can emerge and operate within an entirely simulated reality. Psychedelic consciousness, conversely, demonstrates the potential for the very structure of the self to dissolve, revealing the extent to which our sense of being a distinct ‘I’ depends on the integrity of specific brain networks like the DMN. By providing contrasting examples of self-enhancement (lucidity) and self-dissolution (psychedelic ego loss), the comparison offers complementary insights into the neurocognitive mechanisms that construct, maintain, reflect upon, and potentially dismantle our fundamental sense of identity.

8.4 Future Directions and Concluding Thoughts

While significant progress has been made, much remains to be understood about both lucid dreaming and psychedelic consciousness. Future research would benefit from direct neurobiological comparisons, ideally using multimodal imaging (e.g., simultaneous EEG-fMRI) in individuals capable of experiencing both states, to allow for within-subject contrasts. Further investigation into the therapeutic potential arising from the unique properties of each state – such as using LD training for nightmare disorders or psychedelic-assisted therapy for mood and anxiety disorders – is warranted. Refining theoretical models, particularly integrative frameworks like predictive processing that can potentially account for phenomena across different ASCs, remains a key challenge. Continued exploration of these fascinating states, employing rigorous scientific methods while remaining open to the richness of subjective experience, promises to yield deeper insights into the complex relationship between the brain, the mind, and the nature of consciousness itself. They remind us that our ordinary waking perspective is but one way of experiencing reality, and that exploring the frontiers of consciousness, whether through the internal landscape of dreams or the chemically altered vistas of the psychedelic state, can profoundly expand our understanding of what it means to be human.

Works cited

1. Altered state of consciousness – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altered_state_of_consciousness 2. A Comparative Review of the Neuro-Psychopharmacology of Hallucinogen-Induced Altered States of Consciousness: The Uniqueness of Some Hallucinogens – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270552726_A_Comparative_Review_of_the_Neuro-Psychopharmacology_of_Hallucinogen-Induced_Altered_States_of_Consciousness_The_Uniqueness_of_Some_Hallucinogens 3. Psychedelics and Consciousness: Distinctions, Demarcations, and Opportunities – PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8378075/ 4. Lucid dream – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucid_dream 5. Living In A Lucid Dream – Noema Magazine, https://www.noemamag.com/living-in-a-lucid-dream/ 6. The psychopharmacology of psychedelics: where the brain meets spirituality (CCNP Innovations in Neuropsychopharmacology Award) – Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, https://www.jpn.ca/content/49/5/E301 7. Dreams and Psychedelics: Neurophenomenological Comparison …, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5652011/ 8. The Experience Elicited by Hallucinogens Presents the Highest Similarity to Dreaming within a Large Database of Psychoactive Substance Reports – Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2018.00007/full 9. Dreams and Psychedelics – Semantic Scholar, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f444/02edc23e025049a510efea84f330833059dc.pdf 10. (PDF) A Literature Review on the Dreamlike Nature of Psychedelic Experiences, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379782404_A_Literature_Review_on_the_Dreamlike_Nature_of_Psychedelic_Experiences 11. (PDF) Dreams and Psychedelics: Neurophenomenological Comparison and Therapeutic Implications – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317684517_Dreams_and_Psychedelics_Neurophenomenological_Comparison_and_Therapeutic_Implications 12. Are we really unconscious in “unconscious” states? Common assumptions revisited – PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9581328/ 13. Exploring the neural correlates of dream phenomenology and altered states of consciousness during sleep – Oxford Academic, https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2017/1/nix009/3859602 14. www.researchgate.net, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45360073_Different_kinds_of_subjective_experience_during_lucid_dreaming_may_have_different_neural_substrates#:~:text=Lucid%20dreaming%20(LD)%20is%20a%20mental%20state%20in%20which%20we,out%2Dof%2Dbody%20experiences. 15. Effective connectivity changes in LSD-induced altered states of …, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1815129116 16. The Neurobiology of Consciousness: Lucid Dreaming Wakes Up, https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/IJoDR/article/download/403/pdf_1/1515 17. Dimensions of consciousness and the psychedelic state – Oxford Academic, https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2018/1/niy008/5103991 18. Lucid dreaming | Description, Characteristics, Prevalence, & Effects – Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/science/lucid-dreaming 19. On the varieties of conscious experiences: Altered Beliefs Under Psychedelics (ALBUS) – Oxford Academic, https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2025/1/niae038/8011394 20. Dream Lucidity and the Attentional Network Task – PMC – PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7876060/ 21. The cognitive neuroscience of lucid dreaming – PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6451677/ 22. Different kinds of subjective experience during lucid dreaming may have different neural substrates – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45360073_Different_kinds_of_subjective_experience_during_lucid_dreaming_may_have_different_neural_substrates 23. A Systematic Review of Lucid Dreaming – Wofford College, https://webs.wofford.edu/pittmandw/psy451/fall18br.pdf 24. Voss, U. & Hobson, A. (2015). What is the State-of-the-Art on Lucid Dreaming? – Open Philanthropy, https://www.openphilanthropy.org/files/Research/Moral_Patienthood/Voss_Hobson_(2015).pdf 25. Neuropsychopharmacological Induction of (Lucid) Dreams: A Narrative Review – PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11119155/ 26. A State of Consciousness with Features of Both Waking and Non-Lucid Dreaming – PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2737577/ 27. Awake or Sleeping? Maybe Both… A Review of Sleep-Related Dissociative States – PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10299622/ 28. Lucid Dreaming, Nightmares, and Sleep Paralysis: Associations With Reality Testing Deficits and Paranormal Experience/Belief – Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00471/full 29. Getting lucid about lucid dreaming | The Philosophical Quarterly – Oxford Academic, https://academic.oup.com/pq/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pq/pqae138/7889345 30. Neural Correlates of Dream Lucidity Obtained from Contrasting Lucid versus Non-Lucid REM Sleep: A Combined EEG/fMRI Case Study – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228105827_Neural_Correlates_of_Dream_Lucidity_Obtained_from_Contrasting_Lucid_versus_Non-Lucid_REM_Sleep_A_Combined_EEGfMRI_Case_Study 31. Mental Imagery in Dreams of Congenitally Blind People – PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10605848/ 32. Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry | Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice, https://www.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.prcp.20200023 33. The Mechanisms of Psychedelic Visionary Experiences: Hypotheses from Evolutionary Psychology – Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2017.00539/full 34. Effective connectivity of emotion and cognition under psilocybin | medRxiv, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.06.22279626v2.full 35. Neurophenomenological comparison between dreaming and psychedelic states. | Download Table – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Neurophenomenological-comparison-between-dreaming-and-psychedelic-states_tbl1_317684517 36. Psychedelics and fNIRS neuroimaging: exploring new opportunities – SPIE Digital Library, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/neurophotonics/volume-10/issue-1/013506/Psychedelics-and-fNIRS-neuroimaging-exploring-new-opportunities/10.1117/1.NPh.10.1.013506.full 37. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8378075/#:~:text=The%20specific%20altered%20states%20of,5%2Ddimensional%20altered%20states%20of 38. Converging theories on dreaming: Between Freud, predictive processing, and psychedelic research – PMC – PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9978341/ 39. Journeys Beyond: Contrasting Psychedelic Trips and Near-Death Experiences, https://neurosciencenews.com/dne-psychedelics-experience-23713/ 40. The connection between psilocybin and dreaming | Lake Forest …, https://www.lakeforest.edu/news/the-connection-between-psilocybin-and-dreaming 41. Cross-validation of the ego dissolution scale: implications for studying psychedelics, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1267611/full 42. Finding the self by losing the self: Neural correlates of ego‐dissolution under psilocybin – PMC – PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6869189/ 43. Within-subject comparison of near-death and psychedelic experiences: acute and enduring effects – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383295187_Within-subject_comparison_of_near-death_and_psychedelic_experiences_acute_and_enduring_effects 44. Functional Neuroimaging of Psychedelic Experience: An Overview of Psychological and Neural Effects and their Relevance to Research on Creativity, Daydreaming, and Dreaming (Chapter 6), https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-the-neuroscience-of-creativity/functional-neuroimaging-of-psychedelic-experience-an-overview-of-psychological-and-neural-effects-and-their-relevance-to-research-on-creativity-daydreaming-and-dreaming/A16F7FA14DBBB936183FAF7AB885BAD9 45. (PDF) Default Mode Network Modulation by Psychedelics: A …, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364651800_Default_Mode_Network_Modulation_by_Psychedelics_A_Systematic_Review 46. Towards a Unified Theoretical Account of Insight Problem-Solving, Predictive Processing & Relevance R – OSF, https://osf.io/hu87m_v2/download/?format=pdf 47. The Experience Elicited by Hallucinogens Presents the Highest Similarity to Dreaming within a Large Database of Psychoactive Substance Reports – PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5786560/ 48. Dreams and Psychedelics: Non-Ordinary States of Consciousness, https://psychedelic.support/resources/dreams-psychedelics-non-ordinary-states-consciousness/ 49. Similarities in Beneficial Effects on Personal Development and Well-being Between Psychedelic States and Dream States – Student theses Faculty of Religion, Culture and Society, https://rcs.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/573/1/1920-RHW%20%20Staszcyk,%20M.%20%20Ma-thesis.pdf 50. Consciousness Perspectives Forum Reports – Scientific and Medical Network, https://scientificandmedical.net/consciousness-perspectives-forum/reports/ 51. Dreamlike effects of LSD on waking imagery in humans depend on serotonin 2A receptor activation, https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/138323/1/Kraehenmann_ms_Psych-2016-00458_R3_20032017.pdf 52. Electrophysiological correlates of lucid dreaming – bioRxiv, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.09.588765v1.full-text 53. The Neurocognitive Theory of Dreaming – MIT Press Direct, https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/5401/bookpreview-pdf/2231557 54. The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs – Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00020/full 55. Search Engine Optimization SEO & Paid Search – Dream Theory, https://www.dreamtheory.com/marketing/ 56. Dream Theory | Creative and Marketing Agency in Delray Beach, Florida, https://www.dreamtheory.com/ 57. DR . RAZ EVEN – תורת החלומות DREAM THEORIES AND SCIENCE …, https://www.dreamtheory.org/?author=1 58. DR . RAZ EVEN – תורת החלומות DREAM THEORIES AND SCIENCE OF DREAMING, https://www.dreamtheory.org/?author=57 59. תורת החלומות DREAM THEORIES AND SCIENCE OF DREAMING …, https://www.dreamtheory.org/ 60. Dreaming and Offline Memory Processing – PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3557787/ 61. Dreaming, Mind-Wandering, and Hypnotic Dreams – PMC – PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7581699/ 62. Natural Kinds of Sleep Experience – PhilSci-Archive, https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/22427/7/NKSE%20preprint.pdf 63. Modulating dream experience: Noninvasive brain stimulation over the sensorimotor cortex reduces dream movement – PMC – PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7174293/